WK Cheetah
Challenge
IntelliConnect, Wolters Kluwer Legal & Regulatory Solutions' flagship legal research product had many issues:
Product was not designed to support customers' needs, instead it reflected the politics of the organization
Low levels of customer satisfaction resulted in a retention rate of 84% – sales team expended significant effort just to replace customers
Revenue growth was driven by price increases, rather than new customer acquisition, which generated friction with customers
Action
Secured a 3x investment in design from executive leadership to align product to customer needs:
Oversaw conception of a new product that re-imagined the legal research experience using an outside-in, customer-centric process
Designed in collaboration with our customers to create a product that supports and streamlines their legal research workflow
Focused on optimizing experience for context and task – making sure that whatever a user might need is available at the point of need
Led the creation of a simple, elegant, seamless experience that is comparable to our customers' favorite consumer websites
Result
Cheetah, the new product, is:
Aligned to users' needs and goals
Driving print to digital migration for print "hold-outs"
Generating 15+% increases in sales/subscriptions for customer migrating from legacy platform
Voted Best New Product for 2015 by legal professionals
Usability Testing
Central to the concept of designing Cheetah in collaboration with our customers is the usability testing process. Using an iterative design/test methodology, we ensured that Cheetah is closely aligned to our customers’ needs, goals and behaviors, eliminating friction in the legal research process that historically prevented users from completing their research efficiently.
You can see the power of this methodology in the following heat map, which illustrates the progression of the design over the first three rounds of usability testing:
The heat map shows the design’s success/failure in enabling users to complete tasks. Each square represents a user, and the colors illustrate the performance of the design:
red = fail
orange = struggle
yellow = some hesitation
green = complete success
white squares indicate that the task was not tested
With each round of usability testing, and the associated modifications, the design improved and users became more successful (more green).